Categories
Insights

Briefings Are Back: An Analytical Look At What Was Discussed In The First Six Months Of White House Press Briefings

When President Biden took office in January, he brought with him the return of the White House press briefings. Prior to January 2020, the briefing room lay empty for nearly two years after former President Trump ended the daily briefings in March 2019. Even before he ended the briefings altogether, Trump held less than half as many as prior administrations.

The return of the daily briefing offered the media and general public insight into the Biden administration’s agenda and priorities, as well as a degree of accountability on the president’s campaign promises and the American people’s priorities for the new administration.

HPS set out to analyze the first six months of press briefings, reviewing transcripts of 160 White House briefings and press gaggles by Press Secretary Jen Psaki, Deputy Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre, and the White House COVID-19 Response Team. Our analysis found that their discussions with White House reporters during the first six months of the administration broadly aligned with the public’s priorities

Unsurprisingly, discussion of COVID-19 dominated the daily briefings, with more than three times as many mentions as the next-most popular topic, foreign affairs (broadly capturing discussion on China, Russia, Afghanistan, and other global issues). Washington was buzzing with infrastructure talk all spring and summer as the Biden administration prioritized passing a bipartisan infrastructure package; however, infrastructure mentions lagged in the administration’s formal briefing room platform at just under 1,500 mentions. Likewise, there were relatively few immigration mentions, despite immigration ranking as the third-most important issue to Americans in a June survey and the ongoing crisis at the U.S.-Mexico border.

The majority of COVID-19 related mentions were associated with vaccines. On March 11, 2021, the Biden administration announced that all American adults would be eligible to receive a COVID-19 vaccine by May 1. Accordingly, briefings and press questions on vaccines peaked in March and April and seemed to plateau by June. In early July, Biden took the stage to announce that about 70% of American adults had been vaccinated. But not long after signaling America was close to “declaring our independence” from COVID-19, the Delta variant took the nation by storm. Although our analysis only goes through July 20—the six-month mark for Biden’s presidency—HPS and any casual observer of the White House press briefings can safely assume there has been a spike in mentions of vaccines in the last month. 

While the COVID-19 pandemic topped overall mentions, the Department of Health & Human Services lagged in briefing room discussions. The second-most discussed topic was foreign affairs—which naturally encompasses both diplomatic and military-related issues. Notably, mentions of the State Department far outweighed mentions of the Department of Defense, indicating Biden to be a “diplomacy over aggression” president. 

In the briefing room, mentions of jobs far eclipsed all other economic terms. Jobs consistently garnered more than double the number of mentions of other economic terms, peaking in April when the March jobs numbers released showed the fastest growth since August 2020. As tracked by HPS’ monthly Jobs Day Fact Sheets, June posted similar numbers to March, but at that point, the economic recovery was steadily progressing, and the surge in employment didn’t lead to another spike in jobs mentions.

Biden took office as the most experienced president in matters of foreign policy in at least 30 years. When Biden was inaugurated, the top foreign policy questions he faced revolved around how the U.S. would counter China’s growing power and how he might alter the U.S. relationship with Russia following years of investigations and allegations of serious transgressions during the Trump administration. As expected, Russia and China dominated foreign affairs discussions during the press briefings. 

However, as with any administration, other foreign policy issues quickly arose and demanded imminent attention. Mentions of Iran in the briefing room peaked in February, when Iran rejected an offer to negotiate directly with the U.S. regarding the nuclear deal, and have tailed off ever since. Mentions of Israel/Palestine jumped dramatically in May during the crisis in Gaza. 

Afghanistan mentions initially spiked after the Biden administration announced on April 13, 2021 that the U.S. would complete its withdrawal of forces from the country by September 11. Afghanistan then seemed to fall off the press briefing radar in May before returning to prominence in June and July. While the graph reflects data only through July 20, HPS expects press briefing discussion of Afghanistan to have surged in late July and August—with mentions likely continuing to remain high into the fall. 

After both the Senate and presidency flipped this year, Beltway chatter has focused on Democratic policy priorities including voting rights, police reform, and climate change. However, these terms didn’t break through in the briefing room as much as others, registering in just one in four or one in five briefings. Antitrust issues also received few mentions, at just 12 over the course of six months, despite Congressional focus on antitrust in the tech sector. Also surprising was the lack of discussion on student debt or student loans, which received just 16 total mentions.

Despite the Biden administration’s determination to start a new chapter, the media’s addiction to Trump was hard to curb after four years of obsessing over the former president’s every tweet and comment. Trump was mentioned in over half of the briefings, more than twice as frequently as any other politician. The politicians who were referenced in the most briefings following Trump were Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY), Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), Senator Joe Manchin (D-WV), and Senator Susan Collins (R-ME).

Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA), a champion for progressives and frequent participant in Senate debates, was mentioned in only 4% of briefings. Likewise, Senator Krysten Sinema (D-AZ) was mentioned in just 4% of briefings, despite becoming a prominent voice in recent rounds of infrastructure discussions. 

The Next Six Months

Looking forward, HPS expects COVID-19 and foreign affairs to remain the top two topics in the briefing room, with mentions of vaccines dominating the former and Afghanistan driving the latter. We expect the economy to remain a top-three category, especially as the infrastructure, budget, and debt-ceiling debates heat up this fall.

Methodology 

HPS conducted text analysis on hundreds of hand-selected key terms within 160 White House briefings (including press briefings in the White House briefing room, press gaggles aboard Air Force One, and briefings by the COVID-19 Response Team) from January 21, 2021 to July 20, 2021. 

Categories
Insights

Insights: A Conversation with White House Historical Association President Stewart McLaurin

To people around the world, the White House is a potent symbol of American democracy. In this episode of HPS Insights, Stewart McLaurin, President of the White House Historical Association and author of “James Hoban: Designer and Builder of the White House,” joins HPS Partner Michael Steel to discuss his work to preserve the history of one of America’s most renowned landmarks and the overlooked story of the man who designed it.

Stewart explains how James Hoban’s story foreshadows the American Dream: As a poor Irish immigrant, Hoban came to America looking for religious freedom and a better career. He designed the White House and worked with a diverse team of builders, including enslaved workers, Scottish stonemasons, and others. Today, Hoban’s work is known far better than he is himself. Stewart’s book offers fascinating insights into Hoban’s life and showcases his work beyond the White House.

Michael and Stewart also discuss the work of the White House Historical Association, whose 60th anniversary is this year. Stewart has collaborated with three administrations to preserve and promote White House history, each one leaving a lasting mark on the White House. Finally, Stewart explains how listeners can get involved with the Association’s mission.

You can listen to the full conversation here. Subscribe to the HPS Podcast Channel on your favorite podcast service for more insights.

Categories
Insights

Hamilton Place Strategies and Ballast Research Announce Partnership with alva

A few weeks ago when HPS and Ballast Research announced our partnership we hinted at more to come. Today we’re thrilled to announce our new partnership with alva, a London-based stakeholder intelligence platform, thanks to a majority stake support by Falfurrias Capital Partners (FCP).

alva is an exciting and valuable addition to our partnership as we continue to build a comprehensive suite of services to help companies manage their reputations with all stakeholders.  In our work alva will help us to deliver richer, more insightful, and global solutions for our clients.  

The team at alva created a stakeholder intelligence platform that provides data-rich, real-time technology to companies across industries, including financial services, consumer, healthcare, and professional services.  The platform can deliver rich insights by analyzing more than 25 million pieces of content every day across 100 languages, 150 countries, and over 500,000 individual publications. 

We’re especially excited about alva‘s ESG assessment tools.  As ESG criteria are being weighed to assess performance, companies and investors are searching for solutions — both for understanding the materiality of risks and for comparison against market peers. Building on over 10 years of experience in delivering board-level reputation analysis to blue-chip firms, alva‘s ESG Intelligence tool provides comprehensive analysis of how any company is performing against its peer group.

As with our partnership with Ballast Research, we’ll reach out in the coming weeks to preview how alva‘s powerful tools can be helpful to you and your company. 

Categories
Insights

Capitol Chatter: 2021 Q2 Analysis Of Congressional Tweets

Welcome back to Capitol Chatter: A Quarterly Analysis Of Congressional Tweets, where we help you keep track of what Congress is tweeting.

In the second quarter, congressional Twitter accounts sent out 145,607 tweets — a slight drop from the nearly 158,000 tweets in the first quarter. COVID-19 fell from being the most tweeted-about topic as lawmakers increased focus on legislative and budget priorities, especially infrastructure. Democrats are still tweeting more than Republicans, but Sen. John Cornyn remained the most prolific tweeter of any congressional member or committee. Read on for our other findings.

In Q2, the economy overtook the pandemic as the most frequently mentioned topic. The decreased attention on COVID-19-related topics made space for other topics, including a 515% increase in tweets related to infrastructure and a noticeable bump in foreign affairs and defense-related issues. Racial inequality saw a 15% increase in mentions from Q1 to Q2, with a high volume of Tweets around the Derek Chauvin trial and the anniversary of George Floyd’s murder. Democrats were three times more likely than Republicans to tweet about racial inequality. 

Looking at the average number of tweets per member per day, it becomes clear that despite the many differences between members of Congress, members generally follow a regular cadence on Twitter across parties and chambers. The most tweeted-about event by members of Congress was President Biden’s Joint Address to Congress, with members tweeting an average of 9.2 times on that day. 

Democrats’ and Republicans’ different focuses on Twitter are most evident in how and how much they talk about the COVID-19 pandemic. Amidst the overall decrease in congressional tweets related to the pandemic, Democrats mentioned COVID-19 2.5 times as much as their Republican counterparts. Democrats have also remained dedicated to promoting COVID-19 vaccination, mentioning vaccines nearly five times as much as their friends across the aisle. Compared to the top-five topics for Democrats in Q1, Trump, Pandemic, and Honor fell off the list. 

Tax was a top priority for both parties, with tweets ranging from raising taxes on the wealthy to promotions of GOP tax reform efforts and reminders to file taxes around May’s “tax day.” The term “bipartisan” became the third most tweeted-about term for Republicans, with over 13% of these tweets from Republicans mentioning bipartisan also mentioning infrastructure. Other bill introductions were also frequently mentioned along with the term bipartisan. It is worth noting that Democrats actually mentioned the term “bipartisan” more than Republicans but the topic isn’t in the top five for Democrats because, on average, Democrats are considerably and consistently more active on Twitter than their Republican counterparts. Compared to the top-5 topics for Republicans in Q1, School, Vaccine, and Honor fell off the list, replaced by Bipartisan, Jobs, and Health. 

Sen. John Cornyn remained on top of the Twitter leaderboard. Interestingly, while frequent Democratic tweeters are all members of the House, Republican frequent-tweeters are a mix of both members of the House and Senate. Frequent Republican tweeters remained fairly consistent, with just Reps. Debbie Lesko and Matt Gaetz falling off the list, replaced by Sen. Rob Portman and Rep. Ken Buck. There was a bigger shakeup on the Democratic side, with four accounts (Reps. Adriano Espaillat and Raja Krishnamoorthi, the House Judiciary Democrats account, and Sen. Chuck Schumer) falling out of the leader board. They were replaced by Reps. Mary Gay Scanlon, Sean Casten, Mark Pocan, and Val Demmings.

Methodology

HPS conducted text analysis on all tweets and retweets from handles included in CSPAN’s “members of Congress” Twitter list that were posted between April 1, 2021 and June 30, 2021. In total, we searched for more than 150 keywords in each of the 145,607 tweets to determine which topics were discussed in each.

Categories
Insights

HPS Announces New Directors Julia Decerega And JinAh Kim

WASHINGTON, D.C. – Hamilton Place Strategies (HPS) announced today that Julia Decerega and JinAh Kim have been promoted to directors.

“Julia and JinAh are essential members of the HPS team,” said Matt McDonald. “Over the course of their time at the firm, they have benefitted our clients and teams through strong leadership, creativity, and strategic thinking. I’m very excited to work with them as they continue to grow professionally, contribute to our strong culture at HPS, and support our clients to reach their goals.”

Since joining HPS in 2018, Julia has led a number of strategic and crisis communications projects related to financial services, technology, economic development, and regulatory issues. Throughout her time at HPS, Julia has helped to develop and implement public affairs strategies for complex regulatory approval processes, including deals involving the DOJ and CFIUS. Julia has also been a driving force behind the development of the firm’s external research and insights products.

Since joining HPS alongside Julia in 2018, JinAh has spearheaded data and analysis-focused projects in sectors including financial services, housing, and transportation. As a founding member of HPS Creative, HPS’ creative services practice, she helps lead the firm’s work blending brand strategy, digital storytelling, and creative marketing to scale the reach and resonance of our clients’ insights and ideas. During HPS’ own rebrand in 2020, JinAh played a central role in the development of a refreshed brand authentic to HPS’ established record of data-driven public affairs.

Categories
Insights

Hamilton Place Strategies and Flag Media Analytics Partner with Ballast Research to Offer Data-Driven Public Affairs and Reputation Management, Supported by Falfurrias Capital Investment

WASHINGTON – Today Hamilton Place Strategies (HPS) and Flag Media Analytics (Flag) announced their partnership with Ballast Research, bringing together data-driven public affairs and reputation management across an increasingly complex policy landscape. This partnership is supported by a majority capital investment by Charlotte, North Carolina private equity firm Falfurrias Capital Partners (FCP).

The firms will operate under their existing brands while collaborating and servicing clients in partnership, allowing them to deliver better insights, strategies, and execution for clients across a broad range of issues. 

“We’re thrilled to be growing our business with these partners,” said HPS Founding Partner Tony Fratto. “We built a business based on exceptional talent and constant innovation, and it’s wonderful to see that approach recognized and supported by the team at FCP. Ballast brings unmatched data and insights to understanding issues and the impact of advocacy on policymaking. We can’t wait to partner with them in service of our clients. As we go forward, we’ll continue to seek additional partners that enhance our capabilities and expand our reach.”

“Corporations everywhere are facing an increasingly complex set of challenges, not only from competitors, but from governments, employees, investors, and a growing array of activists,” said HPS Partner Matt McDonald. “Our job is to deliver solutions to help leaders address those challenges, aligned with their business strategies. Getting those solutions right requires better data, insight, strategy, monitoring, and measuring, on a global scale. That’s what we’re aiming to deliver.”

At a time when companies face increased public scrutiny and expectations to demonstrate value to stakeholders, the partnership between HPS, Flag, and Ballast will provide deep insights and integrated solutions to help organizations navigate the business, political, and regulatory complexities they must consider in telling their stories.

“We are excited for the strategic opportunities this partnership presents,” said FCP Senior Advisor Alex Jutkowitz, who will chair the new entity. “Corporate leaders today are subject to a level of public scrutiny and accountability that requires a new depth of understanding on issues and strategy. This platform is uniquely positioned to fill that acute need.”

FCP Senior Advisor Beth Comstock will also serve on the Board, along with FCP Executives Geordie Pierson and Joe Price.

“We’re excited to partner with HPS and Flag,” said Ballast President Mike Gottlieb. “Their approach to data and analysis pairs perfectly with the research, strategy, and insights Ballast delivers to our clients. We are always looking to put our proprietary research and data to its highest and best use, and this partnership will allow us to offer our colleagues in the public, private, and social sectors more comprehensive solutions to complex issues.”

Although each business will maintain its own independent service offerings, support across the partnering organizations will now include public affairs, media relations, crisis and issue management, research and analysis, political and regulatory risk analysis, global thought leadership, digital strategy, corporate reputation, creative content, and media monitoring and analysis.

KPMG Corporate Finance LLC served as exclusive financial advisor to HPS and Flag.

About Hamilton Place Strategies (HPS)

HPS is an analytical public affairs consulting firm. The firm works on complex issues in highly regulated industries, partnering with clients to advance their most important priorities. HPS was founded in 2010 by partners Tony Fratto and Stuart Siciliano.

About Ballast Research

For nearly a decade, Ballast Research has provided direct feedback from senior policymakers through quantitative and qualitative research. Ballast clients—including Fortune 500 companies, nonprofits, and trade associations—leverage Ballast’s data driven insights to validate impact, identify opportunities, and determine optimal strategy and investment for future success.

About Flag Media Analytics (Flag)

Flag is a next-generation news monitoring service—we use both professionals and technology to support clients. The Flag process is designed to inform the decision-making cycle for media engagement and improve planning, feedback, and reporting for public affairs and communications teams. Flag delivers real-time alerts directly into the inboxes of those engaging and responding to media every day. Its team of dedicated media analysts is trained in the latest media aggregation tools and conducts hands-on analysis to deliver the news and insights clients need to make more informed decisions.

About Falfurrias Capital Partners (FCP)

Operational Focus describes the way the FCP team partners with management teams to leverage its significant, real-world experience to bring measurable contributions and create lasting value in our portfolio companies. By partnering with the most respected experts in their fields, we immerse ourselves in your industry, identify the strongest growth opportunities, and rigorously test and learn using our expertise, data, and tireless investigation. Contributions include technology-enabling a product or service, introducing new product lines through market research and proven strategies, and recruiting high-impact management teams—all with the goal of building lasting value.

Categories
Insights

The Perils Of A Financial Transaction Tax

Introduction

Following the GameStop saga, D.C. lawmakers have renewed calls for the imposition of a financial transaction tax (FTT). FTTs—essentially a tax on every stock market trade—are often cited as an easy way to collect tax revenue and reduce volatility in equity markets. However, the data is pretty clear that these cited benefits are significantly overblown.

First, let’s dig a little deeper into what an FTT is. At its most basic level, an FTT is a tax applied on either the buyer or seller of a security at the time of a financial transaction. These taxes can be implemented to involve specific types of securities, or be applied selectively to certain types of investors. There have been numerous different legislative proposals in recent years, but the latest one was introduced by Sen. Brian Schatz (D-HI) and would impose a tax on the sale of stocks, bonds, and derivatives at 0.1%.

Sen. Schatz and others have indicated an FTT would reduce financial market volatility and market speculation. In fact, an FTT may actually deteriorate market quality, reduce liquidity through increased bid-ask spreads, and increase market volatility. Let’s explore why.

An FTT Will Make Markets Less Efficient

A large pillar of support for an FTT stems from the belief that high frequency trading (HFT)—the use of powerful computers to conduct a high number of trades in fractions of a second—and electronic trading cause volatility due to speculative trading. These attacks have been proven time and again to be false, and research has confirmed that these innovative trading practices have increased market efficiency, liquidity, and stability, creating a more reliable equity market structure that better serves investors during times of stress and calm alike.

Further, evidence from other countries which have implemented FTTs show they do not improve markets. Stocks subject to an FTT in France were traded less frequently, increasing spreads relative to their peers, hurting investors, and decreasing market efficiency. (A bid-ask spread refers to the gap between the ask price and the bid price for an asset in the market; a narrower spread signals high liquidity and efficiency and low transaction costs.) Research on France’s FTT published in January 2021 in the International Review of Finance concluded, “FTTs deter informed trades and reduce market quality.” A similar study published in the Journal of Financial Services Research in 2014 found that the French FTT had a significant impact on market quality, dropping trading volume by one fifth and resulting in a reduction in volume posted at best prices. Similarly, the European Central Bank found evidence that an Italian FTT, “widened the bid-ask spread and increased volatility” in a 2016 research report on the effects of the FTT.

In short, the observed impact of FTTs is that they discourage short term trading, disincentivizing transactions that help stabilize markets and generate price efficiency.

An FTT Isn’t The Revenue Machine Proponents Promise

FTT proponents may acknowledge that the tax might make markets less efficient but that it is worthwhile because it will bring in new tax revenue. That assertion requires a lot of caveats; perhaps most important among them is that the revenue will be raised on the backs of Americans saving for retirement.

Any American with a 401(k), for example, would be subject to the tax every time their fund buys or sells a stock or bond. More than 54% of Americans are invested in the stock market, either directly or through a retirement fund such as 401(k) or IRA, and over 40% of Americans are invested in college education savings plans such as 529.

The impact on retirees would be particularly severe. Consider that 401(k) savings plans primarily benefit middle class families, with 80% of participants in 401(k) plans making less than $100,000 per year, and 43% of participants making less than $50,000 per year. For this group, a 10-basis point (0.1%) FTT would force an average investor to work nearly 2½ years longer than what they would have to work in order to reach the same savings goal without an FTT, according to the investment firm Vanguard.

Further, at a time when we need to spur as much investment into the American economy as possible, an FTT would be an inefficient investment mechanism as it will hinder private sector investment and may fail to materialize the revenue it promises. 

According to a 2011 letter from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, an FTT  “would raise the costs of financing investments to the extent that it made transactions more expensive, financial markets less liquid, and management of financial risks more costly.” As a result, many businesses, as well as state and local governments, looking to finance their activities would face higher costs of borrowing. For example, although municipalities wouldn’t have to directly pay the tax when they issue securities on the market, investors may likely seek higher interest rates on them as they would have to factor the tax into the purchase or sale of these securities on the secondary market. These higher interest rates could in turn hinder government investment for a range of crucial services.

Furthermore, researchers at the CBO also found that a financial transaction tax would affect the funding of state and local pension plans. “Besides initially reducing the value of their existing assets slightly, the tax would raise transaction costs for pension plans. Both of those effects would increase required contributions to the plans,” the letter states.

Critically, the revenue-generating potential of an FTT remains uncertain. A tax that is too high or too narrow could create distortions by encouraging investors to either leave the market or create “synthetic” securities to yield the same economic return without being subject to the tax. According to the Congressional Research Service, “at this point, it is difficult to predict exactly how traders’ behavior will change in response to a tax.”

The Final Word

An FTT is not a new silver-bullet tax policy. Based on results and analysis conducted on the FTTs in France, Italy, and Sweden, it’s clear the policy too frequently over-promises in rhetoric and under-delivers in practice. There are plenty of substantive enhancements that could help strengthen current market dynamics, but an FTT is not one of them. Federal policy should be designed to foster innovation, expand access, and enhance market quality for a U.S. financial system that remains the premier global market. Policymakers should turn their attention to better developed policies that ensure U.S. capital markets remain deep and liquid while delivering positive returns for retirees, pensioners, and investors.

Categories
Insights

Inside The Biden Administration’s Use Of Financial Regulators To Fight Climate Change

Introduction

The Biden Administration is implementing a robust climate change agenda across the executive branch with a particular focus on the role U.S. financial regulators can play in addressing climate risks. On May 20, the White House issued an executive order that would look to leverage both the public and private sectors to address climate-related financial risk. It’s an example of what the President calls his “whole-of-government” approach—similar to Treasury Secretary Yellen’s “whole-of-economy” approach.  

HPS has spent the past several months closely monitoring the actions of financial regulators and has compiled relevant agency announcements, which demonstrate how the Biden administration will seek to use the financial sector to curb climate change.

HPS focused its research on the most active financial regulators, including:

– The Department of the Treasury, with a focus on its domestic and international activity, as well as the work of its new climate czar

– The Financial Stability Oversight Council

– The Securities and Exchange Commission

– The Federal Reserve

Based on this research into the executive branch and Federal Reserve’s current positions and actions, combined with additional insights and analysis, HPS has laid out a roadmap of the likely future policy plans related to finance and climate policy.

Department of the Treasury – Domestic Policy

Key Actions:

Via the American Jobs Plan, Treasury would create tax credits for clean energy production to support the Clean Energy Standard and establish a targeted investment tax credit to incentivize the buildout of >20GW worth of high-voltage power lines.

– Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen and Deputy Secretary Wally Adeyemo discussed leveraging the tax code to eliminate fossil fuel subsidies and drive the U.S. towards net-zero emissions at an April 16 meeting.

– Secretary Yellen met with the Coalition of Finance Ministers for Climate Action on April 6 and said that Treasury is prioritizing domestic economic programs and tax policies that would help the U.S. reach its 2030 emissions target.

– The “Financial Stability Board’s Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures” was lauded by Treasury Secretary Yellen as a “solid framework for climate disclosures.” The Secretary also urged “national and regional authorities that are developing requirements or guidance” to use the framework as a model.

Outlook: 

The Biden administration and Secretary Yellen have made it clear that Treasury will be at the center of U.S. attempts to meet its 2030 emissions targets, which were officially announced by the White House during the climate summit. The goal is to cut CO2 emissions to 50-52% of their 2005 levels.

In remarks to the Institute of International Finance on April 21, 2021, Secretary Yellen reiterated that the Treasury Department will take what she has called a “whole-of-economy” approach to its efforts to address climate change. Secretary Yellen clearly recognizes, and has emphasized, that the goals the Biden administration and progressives have put forth require the cooperation of the private sector. We expect Treasury will continue to make a concerted effort to include both private and public stakeholders in their efforts to marshal resources towards cleaner, sustainable investments.

Department of the Treasury – International Policy

Key Actions:

– Treasury was called on by President Biden via his U.S. International Climate Plan to direct multilateral development banks (MDBs) to “set and apply ambitious climate finance targets and policies,” thereby spurring private financing in developing countries.

– Secretary Yellen will be working with OECD countries to modify official export financing provided by OECD export credit rating agencies so that it encourages investments away from carbon-intensive activities.

– Secretary Yellen also announced that part of Treasury’s strategy will involve allocating $100 billion per year to support developing countries’ climate change mitigation efforts.

– Treasury will be co-chairing the relaunched G20 Sustainable Finance Working Group, which gets finance ministries and central banks to improve the international community’s approach to sustainable investments and climate disclosures.

Outlook:

Secretary Yellen has repeatedly emphasized the need to build international cooperation on climate-related investments and disclosures. Secretary Yellen and Treasury recognize the U.S. needs to garner the support of worldwide actors, including developing countries, to achieve significant progress on climate change and to ensure that American efforts don’t place the country at a competitive disadvantage. Climate Envoy John Kerry is likely to lead those efforts and play a central role in facilitating said relationships albeit in close coordination with Treasury.

Treasury Department has expressed that it wants to see countries require “reliable, consistent, and comparable” climate-risk financial disclosures. It has also indicated that it would like to support international efforts to “better identify climate-aligned investments and encourage financial institutions to credibly align their portfolios and strategies.” Since developing countries are quickly becoming large emitters on their paths to economic growth, we expect Secretary Yellen to incentivize the adoption of clean energy alternatives to ensure these countries cooperate.

Department of Treasury – The Climate Czar

Key Actions:

– John E. Morton was chosen by Secretary Janet Yellen to be the Treasury Department’s first climate counselor, or “czar,” on April 19. Morton will report directly to Secretary Yellen.

– In his new role, Morton will head the new “climate hub,” which is tasked with coordinating climate-related work across the Department—this includes the divisions in charge of domestic finance, international affairs, and tax policy.

– The climate hub’s main priority will be to facilitate new investments in clean energy technologies that can help expedite a transition away from fossil fuels in “high emitting sectors and industries.”

– Under Morton, the climate hub will use taxes and various other economic tools to support infrastructure projects that can withstand extreme weather, reach out to communities vulnerable to extreme weather and/or pollution, and ensure that the transition to cleaner energy “provides economic opportunity across income levels.”

Outlook:

Progressives have voiced their displeasure with the Morton pick, criticizing his connection to the private sector and expressing concerns he may think “climate action can happen voluntarily.” Many of said progressives expressed that they would have preferred Secretary Yellen appoint former Deputy Treasury Secretary and Federal Reserve governor Sarah Bloom Raskin, for she has been an activist for greater regulation of financial firms’ climate-related activities. This could present a challenge to Secretary Yellen and Morton as they try to make headway on their priorities. We anticipate Morton to make public and private overtures to progressives, especially on policy proposals involving the private sector. 

On the international front, Morton, like Secretary Yellen, has communicated that he will seek to “mobilize more private capital to developing countries to help them transition to a lower-carbon economy” by using MDBs. Expect Morton to frame many of his actions as a competitive race between nations and an opportunity for the U.S. to lead on the world stage. 

Financial Stability Oversight Council (FSOC)

Key Actions:

– The Climate-Related Financial Risk executive order issued by President Biden directs the Financial Stability Oversight Council (FSOC), which is led by Secretary Yellen and includes Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell and members of the Securities and Exchange Commission, to produce a report on climate change financial risk data by September 17, 2021.

– The first FSOC meeting of the Biden era was held on March 31 of this year with climate change at the top of the Committee’s agenda. It was the first time that FSOC has focused on climate change since it was established by Congress in 2010.

– President Biden’s U.S. Climate-Related Financial Risk executive order directed FSOC to put together a report, within 180 days, detailing the systemic risks posed by climate change.

– On April 6, Secretary Yellen said that FSOC would work to minimize the potential system-wide consequences posed by financial risks associated with climate change. 

– Secretary Yellen has indicated she would like FSOC to “bring regulators together to share perspectives and identify elements and solutions” to appropriately address the effects of climate change on regulated institutions.

Outlook:

Though the Financial Services Oversight Committee (FSOC) hasn’t traditionally been an active player in the climate debate, progressives have been pushing for the committee to consider the systemic risks posed by climate change. Treasury Secretary Yellen has made clear that it will be one of the Department’s primary tools to minimize climate-related financial risks. She views FSOC’s role as a means to “understand [financial-sector risks associated with climate change], to coordinate across U.S. regulatory agencies in assessing the risks and, if necessary and appropriate, acting to mitigate risks to overall U.S. financial stability.” President Biden’s May 20 Executive Order also underscores FSOC’s key role. 

We expect that many of Treasury’s climate policy announcements and decisions will be made at or through FSOC. Further, we expect the FSOC report mandated by Biden’s executive order to home in on the role of financial institutions, asset managers, and insurers in minimizing climate-related financial risk.

Securities And Exchange Commission (SEC)

Key Actions:

– Shortly after President Biden’s inauguration, Acting Chair Allison Herren Lee set the stage for SEC action on climate by issuing a request for comment on climate change disclosures.

– Along with a request for comment, the SEC began evaluating climate disclosure rules to facilitate “the disclosure of consistent, comparable and reliable information.”

– The SEC Division of Enforcement formed a Climate and ESG Task Force which “will develop initiatives to proactively identify ESG-related misconduct.”

– The SEC Division of Examinations launched an enhanced focus on climate and ESG-related risks and later issued a “risk alert” on ESG investments.

– The SEC Division of Corporate Finance reviewed climate disclosure, which resulted in SEC Acting Chief Accountant Paul Munter urging accountants to consider Financial Accounting Standards Board guidance on how ESG could impact accounting and management disclosures.

Outlook:

With Gary Gensler’s confirmation as SEC Chair and Satyam Khanna serving as Senior Policy Advisor for Climate and ESG, the SEC is expected to aggressively move forward on evaluating its climate agenda.

Gensler, who originally received strong support from progressives, was criticized for naming a corporate defense lawyer as Director of the Division of Enforcement, prompting her to resign. Sen. Elizabeth Warren said Gensler has a chance for a “redo,” suggesting that he will act quickly on progressive priorities, such as climate disclosure.

During his Senate Banking Committee confirmation hearing, Gensler signaled support for issuing a disclosure rulemaking on climate risk. However, Gensler must deal with competing priorities and is targeting the second half of 2021 for SEC action on climate risk disclosure, as regulatory changes would require a lengthy rulemaking process. Expect pushback from Republican Commissioners Hester Peirce and Elad Roisman, who have questioned the SEC’s increased focus on climate. Republican members of Congress, led by Sen. Pat Toomey (R-PA), will also criticize SEC action on climate.

Federal Reserve

Key Actions:

– During the Trump administration, the Fed took its first steps towards addressing the climate. For instance, in November, the Fed formally named climate change as a risk to financial stability. In December, the Fed joined the Network for Greening the Financial System as a member.

– Since President Biden’s inauguration, the Fed’s efforts have only accelerated. In March, the Fed unveiled its framework for analyzing the financial stability implications of climate change. The framework, which is a work in progress, was presented at the FSOC meeting.

– The Fed also recently announced the creation of the Supervision Climate Committee (SCC) to strengthen the capacity to assess financial risks from climate change. To complement its work, the Fed also established the Financial Stability Climate Committee (FSCC) to assess and address climate-related risks.

– Fed Chair Jerome Powell has stressed before Congress that the role of the Fed is to carry out its mandate in supervising that financial institutions are accounting for risk, including climate change.

Outlook:

With climate change at the center of the U.S. and global political agenda, the Fed will continue to address the issue as it relates to financial stability. However, the Fed will continue to face warnings of politicization. Republican lawmakers have argued that climate policy remains outside of the Fed’s jurisdiction. 

Last December, in a letter to Powell, 47 GOP lawmakers discouraged the central bank from imposing stress tests on lenders to measure their vulnerability to climate change.

Then again in March, Senate Banking Committee Republicans told Powell in a letter that they were concerned the Fed might use its supervision of the banking system to “further environmental policy objectives,” which “would be beyond the scope of the Federal Reserve’s mission.”

Powell is now seen as a heavy favorite on Wall Street to be nominated for a second term, which was not the conventional wisdom when Biden took office. If Powell is nominated for another four-year term in early 2022, expect Republicans to make his climate focus a point of emphasis during his confirmation hearing, but Powell and the Fed are unlikely to be deterred from including climate change in its policy considerations.

Conclusion

The Biden Administration has made clear that financial regulators play a critical role in the fight to curb climate change, and it will continue to receive pressure from progressives to execute an aggressive climate agenda. As Biden’s political appointees get settled into their roles, expect the pace of climate-related policy actions coming from financial regulators to accelerate, leaving no potential vehicle for progress untouched. However, opposition from Republicans will remain stalwart, and if the economic recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic continues to fall below expectations, the political appetite for vast changes to the economy could waver, making implementation of the climate agenda more challenging. 

Categories
Insights

HPS Insights: New Podcast Series On Finding A Job In DC

After a year of immeasurable uncertainty, soon-to-be graduates may feel daunted by the DC job search. That’s why HPS is launching a new HPS Insights series, “How To Get A Job In DC,” to demystify the steps students can take in making the leap into the professional world of Washington. 

In this four-part series, HPS Partner Matt McDonald sits down with a number of Beltway veterans to talk about how current college students can prepare for and thrive during their first DC job. Matt talks with public policy experts, executives, program directors, and our very own HPS associates on their experience and tricks of the trade. Conversations cover both how college students can set themselves up for success in the recruiting process and also how to succeed once hired. 

Our episodes are as follows:

Episode 1: How To Get A Job In DC – Preparing For The Working World At School

Matt sits down with job search experts from the Harvard Kennedy School, University of Michigan, and the Batten School of Leadership and Public Policy at the University of Virginia. Each guest shares advice on what campus resources current college students can tap into to prepare them for a post-grad world.

Episode 2: How To Get A Job In DC – Preparing The Perfect Resume

In this episode, we demystify the job application process with experts from Dartmouth who reveal how to translate your story into a compelling application. We discuss pitfalls into which students often fall – conceptualizing their resume as a summary, submitting cover letters that don’t demonstrate familiarity with the company, and more.

Episode 3: How to Get A Job In DC – The Insider’s Take On How To Network In DC

Next, Matt and his guests explore the process of networking to break down the all-important topic of relationship building and explain how young professionals can find their path forward in the murky world of DC careers. 

Episode 4: How To Get A Job In DC – Succeeding In Your First Job

In the final episode, Matt chats with three HPS associates, Cole Kline, Matisse Rogers, and Koby Gordon, about how to approach the beginning of your career and make the most out of your first job out of college. 

To learn more about navigating the job search, and preparing for an exciting career in the 202, tune in to the series here or on your favorite podcast service.

Categories
Insights

HPS Welcomes Class of 2021 Associates

WASHINGTON, D.C. — Hamilton Place Strategies (HPS) is pleased to congratulate the class of 2021 on their recent and upcoming graduations and is excited to welcome our newest class of associates and analysts to the firm.

– Elizabeth Johnson, Boston College
– Ugonwa Okonkwo, Brown University
– Carley Lerner, Duke University
– Jessica Soforenko, Emory University
– John Olds, George Washington University
– Joshua Eli-Azar Gonzalez, Gettysburg College
– Grace Bannister, Harvard University
– Faridat Animashaun, Howard University
– Jack Eichner, University of Michigan
– Michael Taffe, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
– Anna Lisa Lowenstein, University of Pennsylvania
– Kushal Modi, University of Pennsylvania
– Lauren Ott, University of Virginia
– Parker St. Jean, Wake Forest University

“Congratulations to HPS’ incoming class of associates and analysts on their graduations. It’s been a challenging year and our applicants have continued to demonstrate incredible resilience and growth,” HPS Partner Matt McDonald said. “We are confident this class will help us successfully take on the increasingly complex issues in the world today, and we are thrilled to welcome them to our team.”

The associate and analyst program is an integral part of HPS’ commitment to recruiting top talent to deliver the best possible outcomes for our clients. Recruiting takes place each fall, and new hires join after graduation the following year.